Let we now get back to the topic migration, because we want to be clear! Again we are not against migration, we are against migration done in illegal way! We have nothing against ?? or ?? or whatever, like nothing against ?? ... since migrants could be ??, ??, ??, ????, ?? that has nothing to do with ? at all! ?? in Europe is fine too! if human / animal and planet rights of ?? are respected too Second point. We understand perfectly that some refugees really need help! For sure we stand with them, but a) by doing that in legal way b) not abusing human rights or laws or whatever, means not doing a legal migration and then doing another illegal migration, just because you are not happy ... c) by respecting laws and rights in the destination country d) be ready to leave the country, if the country is saying you NO! About "The right to seek asylum in another country for those who have lost the protection of their own country, is enshrined in Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Refugee Convention is the first treaty which turned the ideals of the Declaration into legally binding obligations. It is therefore not a crime to seek asylum, even if the person has entered the country irregularly" YES THIS IS RIGHT! but doing it illegal SHOULD BE A CRIME! The problem here is not missing rights because people are dying by jumping from a wall (= they do almost an intentional suicide!) or because they illegally migrate ... The problem here are: a) walls that don't respect animal rights! https://t.me/BorderWallEcocide b) walls that are build with no sense, even related to humans, and are really useless https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/594 https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/582 c) missing human rights in all such countries https://t.me/MigrationTelegram/580 https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/28 https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/29 d) criminality done related to the illegal migration, no matter if by countries / brands or migrants https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/28 e) see next post