Amnesty ���� 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 2

Part 1 @AmnestyOneToOne95

Los estudios científicos realizados no han podido nunca encontrar pruebas convincentes que demuestren que la pena capital tiene mayor poder disuasorio frente a la delincuencia que otros castigos.

Scientific studies have never been able to find convincing evidence that capital punishment has a greater deterrent power against crime than other punishments

Yes, BUT EVEN THE OPPOSITE!!!!! because this cannot be showed with science!
@DeathSentenceFAQ102

and don't forget that such things DEPENDS FROM A LOT OF FACTORS!!!
@AmnestyFake363
to
@AmnestyFake404

It's like saying "if we give condoms for free, there are no pregnant women anymore" which would be just BULLSHIT!

Plus is NOT just about deterrent!
@AnimalAbuseDeathSentence43
@DeathSentenceFAQ364
@DeathSentenceFAQ375

"The evidence reviewed in this chapter should lead any dispassionate analyst to conclude that it is not prudent to accept the hypothesis that capital punishment, as practised in the United States, deters murder to a marginally greater extent than does the threat and application of the supposedly lesser punishment of life imprisonment"

Who wrote that?
Carolyn Hoyle! a researcher BEING PART OF THIS MAFIA WRITING BULLSHIT! like we showed previously!
@CarolynHoyle
but still 1000x better than Amnesty!

Let we check what she is writing "the non-experimental research to which the study of the deterrent effects of capital punishment is necessarily limited will almost certainly be unable to meet those standards of proof"

"The only scientifically and ethically acceptable conclusion from the complete body of existing social science literature on deterrence and the death penalty is that it is impossible to tell whether deterrent effects are strong or weak or whether they exist at all . . . "

See next post