TODESSTRAFE einfach erklärt. Pro und Contra - Our answer related to death penalty Part 3

Part 1 @DeathSentenceFAQ122

m) 30-40 years in prison??! First this is bullshit! because

m1) people get sentenced as kids for life! this means up to 80-90 years in prison!
@ParoleFacts57
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights137

m2) death sentence after 30-40 years are NOT death penalty, but a life sentence ... where is the goal of that???!
@DeathSentenceFAQ37

Best way would be do to death sentence 1 day after the 100% proof! BUT NOPE, this would just increase crimes probably!
@DeathSentenceFAQ102

So is better to do that after 20 years! even if we have additional risks
@DeathSentenceNOW58

because the goal is not just kill, but even to reduce people wishing to do crimes! and this cannot just reached with sentences, but we need to work on EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION
@StuproFatti382
@EducateYourKids
@BlowjobTelegram
@StudentRightsTelegram128

Don't forget that for terrorism not related to right wing is HUGE COMPLEX!
@DeathSentenceFAQ79
@DeathSentenceFAQ22

Death sentence immediately only in serious crimes, like cannibalism! to keep other prisoners safe!
@DahmerDeathSentence

m3) 20 years NOPE until we do shitty sentences and even after 30 years people are still in prison with no sense!
@DeathSentenceFAQ37
@DeathSentenceFAQ43
@DeathSentenceFAQ72
@ShittyDeathSentences171
in this case we could apply the execution even after 35 years!
@AmnestyBullshit191
@AmnestyBullshit182

but again, 35 years are SHIT! if death sentences get applied with brain!

15 years more with 100-400$ means 0.5 - 2 mio $ WASTED!
@AmnestyBullshit481

already 20 years prison cost 0.75 - 3 mio $!!!! but again, better 3 mio than increased rape or other crimes due to vip suicide!
@DeathSentenceFAQ102