TODESSTRAFE einfach erklärt. Pro und Contra - Our answer related to death penalty Part 3
Part 1
@DeathSentenceFAQ122
m) 30-40 years in prison??! First this is bullshit! because
m1) people get sentenced as kids for life! this means up to 80-90 years in prison!
@ParoleFacts57
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights137
m2) death sentence after 30-40 years are NOT death penalty, but a life sentence ... where is the goal of that???!
@DeathSentenceFAQ37
Best way would be do to death sentence 1 day after the 100% proof! BUT NOPE, this would just increase crimes probably!
@DeathSentenceFAQ102
So is better to do that after 20 years! even if we have additional risks
@DeathSentenceNOW58
because the goal is not just kill, but even to reduce people wishing to do crimes! and this cannot just reached with sentences, but
we need to work on EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION
@StuproFatti382
@EducateYourKids
@BlowjobTelegram
@StudentRightsTelegram128
Don't forget that for terrorism not related to right wing is HUGE COMPLEX!
@DeathSentenceFAQ79
@DeathSentenceFAQ22
Death sentence immediately only in serious crimes, like cannibalism! to keep other prisoners safe!
@DahmerDeathSentence
m3) 20 years NOPE until we do shitty sentences and even after 30 years people are still in prison with no sense!
@DeathSentenceFAQ37
@DeathSentenceFAQ43
@DeathSentenceFAQ72
@ShittyDeathSentences171
in this case we could apply the execution even after 35 years!
@AmnestyBullshit191
@AmnestyBullshit182
but again, 35 years are SHIT! if death sentences get applied with brain!
15 years more with 100-400$ means 0.5 - 2 mio $ WASTED!
@AmnestyBullshit481
already 20 years prison cost 0.75 - 3 mio $!!!! but again, better 3 mio than increased rape or other crimes due to vip suicide!
@DeathSentenceFAQ102
Обсуждение 0
Обсуждение не доступно в веб-версии. Чтобы написать комментарий, перейдите в приложение Telegram.
Обсудить в Telegram