Whether or not there is a general deterrent effect, there is certainly a diminishing effect on crime “since execution eliminates categorically the possibility of recidivism” (Ehrlich, 1975a).

Exactly! It's not only about deterrent, since deterrent depends from SO MANY FACTORS NOT RELATED TO DEATH PENALTY OR NOT!
@AmnestyFake363
to
@AmnestyFake404
and is different from crime to crime and person to person
@CrimeExamples117

WE CANNOT CLASSIFY ALL IN THE SAME CATEGORY!
@DeathSentenceFAQ97

Just think about
@LawsTelegram10
@DeathSentenceNOW60
@SoSorryTelegram24
vs
@SoSorryTelegram19
@SoSorryTelegram25

Katz et al. (2003) doubt that a deterrent effect of the death penalty (when it exists) can be shown with the usual data because the variation in the crime rates is simply not large enough

Moreover, Donohue and Wolfers (2005) note that the debate about the death penalty “may be driven by ideology and advocacy motives”.

OTHER PEOPLE WITH BRAIN!
@DeathSentenceFAQ143

It's just propaganda!
@AmnestyPropaganda
@AmnestyShit82
@addlist

Remember, no matter if to prevent or remove recidivism, we need to work on other things too!
@DeathSentenceFAQ134

University of Oxford: Furthermore, homicide rates have been declining since the early 1990s across all American states, both retentionist and abolitionist 🤦‍♂️
Sorry what???! 😂
@AmnestyPropaganda65
@AmnestyFake404
@LawsTelegram133

"Of course, murder rates are affected by many factors beyond the criminal justice process"
YES; AND THERE IS NOT JUST MURDER!!!!
@CrimeExamples118

University of Oxford: "If the death penalty has a deterrent effect, we would not expect a fall in murder rates following abolition. And yet the murder rate decreased in multiple countries after abolition, including Australia, Canada ...🤦‍♂️

See next post