Eating less meat 'like taking 8m cars off road' https://perma.cc/D3F3-YGMH

based on: Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts

Like we wrote previously here
@VeganFactsTelegram292
or here
@VeganFactsTelegram215
@FoodWasteTelegram
@PollutionFacts

or better exactly here
@VeganFactsTelegram12
@PollutionFacts15
@PollutionFacts20
@PollutionFacts58

For both land use and eutrophication, there is a large difference between the high meat-eaters and all other groups. For eutrophication, the low-meat diet has an impact that is 57.4% (49.6– 68.4%) of the high-meat-eating group. For land use, the impact of low meat-eaters is 43.8% (20.7–65.4%) of the high meat-eaters.

Dietary impacts of vegans were 25.1% (95% uncertainty interval, 15.1–37.0%) of
high meat-eaters (≥100 g total meat consumed per day) for greenhouse
gas emissions, 25.1% (7.1–44.5%) for land use, 46.4% (21.0–81.0%) for water use, 27.0% (19.4–40.4%) for eutrophication and 34.3% (12.0–65.3%) for biodiversity.

Based on the National Diet and Nutrition Survey, which estimated that in 2016–2019, the average consumption of all meat (that is, processed and unprocessed meat including poultry but excluding fish) in 19–64 year olds was 99 g d−1, and 77 g d−1 in the 65+ age group.

Another reason why a ⅓, ⅔ vegan diet, a flexible vegan diet (or a full vegan diet) are a good options to save our planet, without forcing people to be 100% vegan

About that you can find more
@VeganFactsTelegram164
@VeganFactsTelegram165
@VeganFactsTelegram19
@SwitzerlandFacts265
@PollutionFacts16
@VeganNutritionTelegram94
@VeganNutritionTelegram113
@VeganNutritionTelegram114