Breivik human rights complain part 4

P1
@BreivikParole117

In the previous court round, in 2016 and 2017, he was upheld by the District Court on the point about Article 3, but the state won on all points in the Court of Appeal. The case was subsequently rejected by the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg https://perma.cc/MA3R-AWX6
@BreivikParole35
to
@BreivikParole38
@BreivikParole24
to
@BreivikParole27
@BreivikParole111
to
@BreivikParole115
etc.

Results:
@BreivikAbuse58
@BreivikParole89
@BreivikParole111
@BreivikParole117
@HumanRightAbuse73

PLUS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET, MEANS
@BreivikParole102
to
@BreivikParole107
@BreivikParole25
@BreivikParole38
@BreivikParole117
especially
@BreivikParole110
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights66
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights67

Why do we don't share how much such week costed to the state?

Just a quick example considering 10 people with a wage of 50$ for 5 days and 8 hours = 20K only related to this, plus we need to consider all what is happening behind that (even the decision was not taked inside such 5 days ...), the fact that a judge / lawyer for sure has no a wage of 50$/h ..

WTF they get 4000 CHF during a practicum, while other people get 0 CHF DURING A BACHELOR PRACTICUM (last year)!!
@StudentRightsTelegram155

THIS IS JUST JOB DISCRIMINATION!
@LawsTelegram97
@JobDiscrimination
@JobsFacts

Then we complain why death penalty is fucking expensive! LET WE STOP ALL SUCH OVERPAID JOBS! that don't take responsibility when they do shit!
@DeathSentenceFAQ135
@DeathSentenceFAQ176

We clearly say��‍♂️ JOB DISCRIMINATION ��‍♂️ OVERPAID JOBS ✅ DEATH PENALTY ��‍♂️ EXCUSES IT COSTS TOO MUCH!
@DeathSentenceFAQ176