TODESSTRAFE einfach erklärt. Pro und Contra - Our answer related to death penalty Part 4

Part 1 @DeathSentenceFAQ122

So again, better 3 mio than increased rape or other crimes due to vip suicide!
@DeathSentenceFAQ102
@DeathSentenceFAQ15

and never forget homicide is not homicide, same for all other things!
@DeathSentenceFAQ75
@DeathSentenceFAQ129
@AfDFakten1100

n) is not cheaper ... studies show .... yes, if we WASTE 400 mio $ for doing a single death sentence! WHICH IS JUST A SHAME!

but yes, 13 years for child rape and legal marijuana in California is more important!
@TerrorismTelegram1145
@TerrorismTelegram1146

Again, if someone has 100% proof he needs to get death sentence (in case of serious crimes)
@DeathSentenceNOW58
@LawsTelegram132
otherwise just life!
@DeathSentenceFAQ98

o) too many things than make all expensive ... IF THERE IS A GOOD PROOF you don't need to waste 30 years in investigation trying to find a small reason why not ... but obviously investigation is huge important!

Especially the first investigation, in Breivik style, is huge important!
@BreivikParole69
@BreivikBullshit69
@BreivikParole101
to
@BreivikParole107
@BreivikParole37
@BreivikParole40
@BreivikParole41

Not to proof he did the attack, but more to know all infos behind to understand why it happened?! how we can improve?!
@LearnWithNorway
@BreivikErrors
@HanauBreivik
@BreivikFacts
@SoSorryTelegram
@BreivikCrimes
@BreivikSyndrome3

so let we stop such no sense parole! when 100% proof are available
@BreivikParole101

p) again, don't forget to reduce all overpaid wages!
@BreivikParole104
@JobsFacts
@JobDiscrimination
@LawsTelegram97