Amnesty 🇪🇸 1:1 pena de muerte / death penalty Part 7

Part 1 @AmnestyOneToOne95

So again, AMNESTY AND CAROLYN HOYLE (= University of Oxford) ARE FAKE SCIENCE AND INFOS! where Carolyn is 1000x better than Amnesty BUT STILL YEARS AWAY FROM BEING PERFECT!
@CarolynHoyle

Not just them, even John Bessler and co. are BULLSHIT!
@JohnBessler
@DeathPenaltyMafia

Please don't come here with BULLSHIT SCIENCE ABOUT HOMICIDES! since we already verified all such things previously! and we are even ready to verify other things if needed!
@AmnestyFake
@AmnestyFacts
🖇🤡 @addlist

This means even LESS BULLSHIT ABOUT RECIDIVISM!
@RecidivismFacts

or considering some crimes less "worse" since you keep eyes closed about all what is happening BEFORE OR AFTER THE CRIME!
@SuicideRape
@BreivikTrauma
@EmpathyTelegram

Related
@DeathSentenceFAQ361
@DeathSentenceFAQ328
@DeathSentenceFAQ304
etc.

The difference between us and the other two? We share both sides, even if we support death penalty for SOME (not all) crimes! and we are not saying YOU NEED TO IMPLEMENT THAT PUNTO E BASTA! Because even implementing that, doesn't mean implementing that for all crimes or or or! Everyone can do what he wants BUT ONLY AFTER CONSIDERING ALL FACTS! not bullshit! and ALL POINT OF VIEWS! not just from a criminal point of view, forgetting guards, innocent killed, homeless, etc!

Check all previous one to one:
@DeathSentenceFAQ
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights

8. Acuerdos internacionales para la abolición de la pena de muerte

YES EXACTLY 🇪🇺 EUROPE IS A GREAT MAFIA!
@AmnestyOneToOne95
@DeathPenaltyIgnorance211
@AmnestyPropaganda
@DeathPenaltyMafia
@AmnestyBullshit723

Not just related to death penalty!
@EuropeFacts

Innocent
@ShittyDeathSentences178

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 6

Part 1 @AmnestyOneToOne95

El efecto de la abolición en los índices de delincuencia - The effect of abolition on crime rates

En Canadá, por ejemplo, el índice de homicidios por 100.000 habitantes descendió del 3,09 en 1975, el nivel máximo alcanzado y correspondiente al año anterior a la abolición de la pena de muerte para el delito de asesinato, al 2,41 en 1980, y desde entonces ha descendido aún más. En 2002, 26 años después de la abolición de la pena capital, el índice de homicidios era del 1,85 por 100.000 habitantes, un 40 por ciento inferior al de 1975.

In Canada, for example, the homicide rate per 100,000 inhabitants fell from 3.09 in 1975, the highest level reached and corresponding to the year before the abolition of the death penalty for the crime of murder, to 2.41 in 1980. , and has since fallen even further. In 2002, 26 years after the abolition of capital punishment, the homicide rate was 1.85 per 100,000 inhabitants, 40 percent lower than in 1975.

Here we go! THIS IS BULLSHIT OF AMNESTY AND CAROLYN HOYLE!
@AmnestyShit116
@AmnestyShit32
@AmnestyPropaganda92
@CarolynHoyle19
@LawsTelegram133
@DeathSentenceFAQ328
Backup https://perma.cc/GRS4-RZT4 https://perma.cc/K5H7-52NA https://perma.cc/J3F3-ZWNG
🖇🤡 @addlist

and WE DON'T SUPPORT SUCH BULLSHIT AT ALL!
@LawsTelegram133
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne15

So again Carolyn Hoyle, you are not fully bad! BUT YOU ARE NOT PERFECT TOO!
@CarolynHoyle

WE DON'T SUPPORT MAFIOUS RESEARCHER! Share all facts and share TRUE FACTS! not just half of the informations by posting

Table 9.1 Australia: Murder and manslaughter, rate per 100,000 persons, 1993–2005

when THIS IS AFTER!!! LAST EXECUTION OR THE BAN! without showing WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE THAT OR DURING THAT!
@DeathSentenceFAQ328 https://perma.cc/8QRH-3AR4

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 5

Part 1 @AmnestyOneToOne95

The estimated effects of capital punishment on homicide rates change dramatically even with small changes in econometric specifications!!!
@DeathSentenceFAQ328

LIKE WE SAID! is not just about "death penalty yes or no"! It's MORE COMPLEX!

Fourth, have all the relevant variables been taken into account when attempt- ing to control for those other factors that might affect both the homicide rate and the execution rate? EXACTLY!!!

Factors that may affect the homicide rate, outside gun ownership, are difficult to measure because they are facets of the more general social climate and culture, such as migration, the effectiveness of informal social controls, the extent of alcohol abuse, the availability and price of illegal drugs, the degree of communal integration, and the extent to which there is a ‘sub-culture of violence’ or alternative modes of relieving frustrations other than violence ... etc.
@DeathSentenceFAQ392

At least Carolyn Hoyle has brain and cite such things! instead OF IGNORING LIKE AMNESTY!

Reason why Carolyn Hoyle is 1000x better than Amnesty! BUT still not perfect! sharing all points or facts ...
@CarolynHoyle

Yet, ‘None of the new deterrence studies consider the epidemics of drug use and related violence" 🤦‍♂️ ....

What about cannabis???
@RapeTelegram2284

Let we remember positive correlation between cannabis and homicides, if we exclude poor US states ... Does this mean cannabis increase homicides? NOPE! It's just correlation! NOT A FACT! Like death penalty cannot be correlated in the same way!
@AmnestyFake373

In summary: "... no es prudente aceptar la hipótesis de que la pena capital tenga un mayor poder disuasorio sobre los asesinatos que la amenaza y aplicación de la cadena perpetua, pena supuestamente inferior" IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THIS; THERE IS MUCH MORE BEHIND! and who wrote this book is saying such things too!

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 4

Part 1 @AmnestyOneToOne95

So Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR BEING PRO OR CONTRA RELATED TO THE TOPIC DETERRENT! but don't come here with the bullshit "no death penalty = less homicides!" BECAUSE THIS IS BULLSHIT!
@LawsTelegram133
@AmnestyShit116
🖇🤡 @addlist

and we said previously, Carolyn is not considering all point of views and sometimes is writing bullshit, but she is doing still a better job than Amnesty!
@CarolynHoyle

For, as Dezhbakhsh and Shepherd recognize, executions also have costs: ‘these include the harm from the death penalty’s possibly discriminatory application and the risk of executing innocent people. Policy makers must weigh the benefits and costs to determine the optimal use of the death penalty’

Read such posts
@DeathSentenceFAQ377
@DeathSentenceFAQ355

What she is writing:

First, there is the problem of sufficient data.
First, the percentage of people sentenced to death in the United States who actually are executed is minute so the data will always seem insufficient!!

Second...the executions that do occur are disproportionately centered in a few states—indeed, close to a majority in a single state—so the various effects of skewing hamper sound empirical inference-drawing.

The inference drawn is that the fear of capital punishment rather than long imprisonment will not restrain those who are apt to commit murder, because murder usually arises from an explosion of temper or loss of control, from mental illness or defective personality, or from panic when faced with imminent capture.

Why exactly JUST TALKING ABOUT MURDERS!!! IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT MURDERS!
@DeathSentenceFAQ328

We find that the existing evidence for deterrence is surprisingly fragile ...

See next post

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 3

Part 1 @AmnestyOneToOne95

"Nor is there any reason to change the judgment made in 1985 that the data ‘are not sufficiently strong to lead researchers with different prior beliefs to reach a consensus regarding the deterrent effects of capital punishment"

"Most of those who favour abolition (assuming that they are not opposed to execution under any circumstances) would demand proof that executions have a substantial marginal deterrent effect"
NOPE! WE GIVE A SHIT TO DETERRENT! Is NOT HUGE important for serious criminals! RECIDIVISM IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT!
@AnimalAbuseDeathSentence43

and we know that with death penalty WE KILL RECIDIVISM 100%!
@DeathSentenceFAQ270
@RecidivismFacts
@PrisonBreakFacts
@AmnestyIgnorance
@BreivikParole
@ParoleFacts

Do we keep in prison people that maybe will not do the same crime again? Well THIS IS PART OF THE SAFETY! and we do that with a life sentence too!

Human Rights and Safety of the population = high recidivism risk = high prison escape or whatever > Human Rights of Serious Criminals!
@DeathSentenceFAQ387

doesn't matter if Breivik will or will not redo a terror attack! BREIVIK IS A SERIOUS RISK and many other criminals are even a serious risk!
@AndersBehringBreivikTelegram768
even if there is the possibility he will never do that again! DOESN'T MATTER!

POPULATION > SERIOUS CRIMINALS!
FOREVER!

Plus the real question is deterrent of which type of crime, with which reason????! Why always just talking about deterrent!! Like we do with climate change, talking about average and saying that a baby is polluting exactly like a rich person 🤦‍♂️!
@ClimateChangeTelegram67

This is NOT science and facts! This is just 💩!

No matter what, Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! See next post

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 2

Part 1 @AmnestyOneToOne95

Los estudios científicos realizados no han podido nunca encontrar pruebas convincentes que demuestren que la pena capital tiene mayor poder disuasorio frente a la delincuencia que otros castigos.

Scientific studies have never been able to find convincing evidence that capital punishment has a greater deterrent power against crime than other punishments

Yes, BUT EVEN THE OPPOSITE!!!!! because this cannot be showed with science!
@DeathSentenceFAQ102

and don't forget that such things DEPENDS FROM A LOT OF FACTORS!!!
@AmnestyFake363
to
@AmnestyFake404

It's like saying "if we give condoms for free, there are no pregnant women anymore" which would be just BULLSHIT!

Plus is NOT just about deterrent!
@AnimalAbuseDeathSentence43
@DeathSentenceFAQ364
@DeathSentenceFAQ375

"The evidence reviewed in this chapter should lead any dispassionate analyst to conclude that it is not prudent to accept the hypothesis that capital punishment, as practised in the United States, deters murder to a marginally greater extent than does the threat and application of the supposedly lesser punishment of life imprisonment"

Who wrote that?
Carolyn Hoyle! a researcher BEING PART OF THIS MAFIA WRITING BULLSHIT! like we showed previously!
@CarolynHoyle
but still 1000x better than Amnesty!

Let we check what she is writing "the non-experimental research to which the study of the deterrent effects of capital punishment is necessarily limited will almost certainly be unable to meet those standards of proof"

"The only scientifically and ethically acceptable conclusion from the complete body of existing social science literature on deterrence and the death penalty is that it is impossible to tell whether deterrent effects are strong or weak or whether they exist at all . . . "

See next post

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 1

Una vez que se ha abolido la pena de muerte, rara vez se restablece ...
Once the death penalty has been abolished, it is rarely reinstated.

Obviously IF THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE AT ALL!
@JohnBessler132
and there is even 🇪🇺 EU MAFIA!
@DeathPenaltyMafia
using 🇪🇺 council and other mafia methods to contrast that
@DeathPenaltyIgnorance211
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights152
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights149

with bullshit facts
@AmnestyPropaganda
@AmnestyFacts
🖇🤡 @addlist
ℹ️ @JoinShareableChatFolders16

Would be time that people DO A CLEAR DISTINCTION BETWEEN TYPE / DEEP / REASON OF CRIMES! instead of putting all criminals in just one 🗑! which is NOT the case at all!
@DeathSentenceFAQ293

En el año 2003, el 84 por ciento de todas las ejecuciones de las que se tuvo noticia tuvieron lugar en China, Estados Unidos, Irán y Vietnam.

In 2003, 84 percent of all reported executions took place in China, the United States, Iran and Vietnam.

Who gives a shit where they are applied! Check
@DeathSentenceFAQ299

Los tratados internacionales para la protección de los derechos humanos prohíben condenar a muerte a toda persona menor de 18 años en el momento de cometerse el delito.

International treaties for the protection of human rights prohibit sentencing to death anyone under 18 years of age at the time of the crime.

Yes, young people deserve death penalty, exactly like women or other, if such people are serious criminals with high recidivism!
@ShittyDeathSentences135
@LawsTelegram176

Young people are criminal EXACTLY LIKE ADULTS! or even much worse in some cases!

See next post

10 raisons d’abolir la peine de mort 1 to 1 with Amnesty Part 2

Part 1 @DeathPenaltyOneToOne613

✅🙅‍♂️ 7 - la peine de mort ne ramène ni la stabilité sociale ni la paix intérieure des victimes.
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne379

🙅‍♂️ 8 - la peine de mort nie la faillibilité des institutions humaines.
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne379
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne380

🙅‍♂️✅ 9 - la peine de mort est une punition collective.
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne380
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne381
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne382

🙅‍♂️ 10 - la peine de mort va contre les valeurs religieuses ou humanistes communes à l’ensemble de l’humanité.
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne387
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne375

More one to one 🇫🇷 / 🇩🇪 / 🇮🇹 / 🇪🇸
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne390

All channels with science and facts!
@addlist
@AmnestyPropaganda
@AmnestyShit
@AmnestyFacts

About homicides / recidivism
@AmnestyFake
@RecidivismFacts
@ParoleFacts
@BreivikParole
@SoSorryTelegram
@BreivikSyndrome
etc.

Our statement about Amnesty
@AmnestyShit116
@AmnestyPropaganda
@DeathSentenceBullshit1546
etc.

10 raisons d’abolir la peine de mort 1 to 1 with Amnesty

🙅‍♂️ 1 - la peine de mort viole le droit à la vie
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne375

🙅‍♂️ 2 - la peine de mort est une sanction cruelle et inhumaine.
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne375
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne376
@DeathPenaltyCruel
@JohnBessler
@DeathPenaltyMafia
@ShittyDeathExecutions

🙅‍♂️ 3 - la peine de mort n’a aucun effet dissuasif.
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne376
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne377
@AmnestyPropaganda
@AmnestyFake
@AmnestyFacts
@addlist

🙅‍♂️ 4 - la peine de mort est un meurtre avec préméditation qui avilit l’Etat et rend la société plus violente.
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne377
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne378

🙅‍♂️ 5 - la peine de mort est discriminatoire dans son application.
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne378
@GovernmentInPrison
@InPrisonNOW
@IgnoringCrimes
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne379
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne380

🙅‍♂️ 6 - la peine de mort nie la capacité de tout homme à s’amender et à devenir meilleur.
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne382
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne383
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne384
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne385
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne386
@DeathPenaltyOneToOne387

Here we go our point of view about child rape:

no prison 💩 < doing nothing with few years prison 💩 < death sentence + VIP SUICIDE = execution immediately / after few months / years 💩 (except for cannibalism) since this would probably just worse child abuse / rape! < (or =) castration + parole 💩 < castration 🥉< life sentence🥈 < death sentence + execution after 20+ years 🥇❤️

100% proof: 💉 death sentence + execution after 20 years
99.99999999% proof: 🚔 life sentence

🙅‍♂️ death execution after 1 days / week / year!
even if the other two options have 2 problems: cost and risk of prison evasion
@PrisonBreakFacts

Full new statement
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights154
to
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights157