Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 3

Part 1 @AmnestyOneToOne95

"Nor is there any reason to change the judgment made in 1985 that the data ‘are not sufficiently strong to lead researchers with different prior beliefs to reach a consensus regarding the deterrent effects of capital punishment"

"Most of those who favour abolition (assuming that they are not opposed to execution under any circumstances) would demand proof that executions have a substantial marginal deterrent effect"
NOPE! WE GIVE A SHIT TO DETERRENT! Is NOT HUGE important for serious criminals! RECIDIVISM IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT!
@AnimalAbuseDeathSentence43

and we know that with death penalty WE KILL RECIDIVISM 100%!
@DeathSentenceFAQ270
@RecidivismFacts
@PrisonBreakFacts
@AmnestyIgnorance
@BreivikParole
@ParoleFacts

Do we keep in prison people that maybe will not do the same crime again? Well THIS IS PART OF THE SAFETY! and we do that with a life sentence too!

Human Rights and Safety of the population = high recidivism risk = high prison escape or whatever > Human Rights of Serious Criminals!
@DeathSentenceFAQ387

doesn't matter if Breivik will or will not redo a terror attack! BREIVIK IS A SERIOUS RISK and many other criminals are even a serious risk!
@AndersBehringBreivikTelegram768
even if there is the possibility he will never do that again! DOESN'T MATTER!

POPULATION > SERIOUS CRIMINALS!
FOREVER!

Plus the real question is deterrent of which type of crime, with which reason????! Why always just talking about deterrent!! Like we do with climate change, talking about average and saying that a baby is polluting exactly like a rich person 🤦‍♂️!
@ClimateChangeTelegram67

This is NOT science and facts! This is just 💩!

No matter what, Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! See next post