DAO raids: the new “profit scheme” for whales and arbitrage traders? ️
️
In 2023–2024, the crypto world witnessed several high-profile attacks on DAOs. So-called “raiders” bought up governance tokens not to build the community, but to seize DAO treasuries. The most notorious cases — Nouns DAO and Aragon DAO
In Nouns DAO, investors spotted an arbitrage: the price of an NFT with voting rights was lower than the treasury value per token. They started buying in bulk and pushing their proposals.
In Aragon DAO, raiders managed to acquire a controlling stake and voted to reallocate assets — tens of thousands of ETH were pulled from the treasury, effectively “resetting” the DAO.
Don’t be like these guys. In XDAO, protection against such raids is built into the architecture:
GP tokens are non-transferable and non-tradable. They cannot be bought on the market to gain control over a DAO
Transfers of GP tokens are only possible through consensus. They can move between wallets solely by decision of DAO members
The architecture eliminates raid scenarios. DAOs are shielded from hostile takeovers, and power cannot be concentrated in a single holder’s
hands
Ignore these safeguards, and a DAO’s treasury becomes an easy target for raiders. With the right architecture, a DAO remains a tool for growth — not a playground for speculation
Обсуждение 58
Обсуждение не доступно в веб-версии. Чтобы написать комментарий, перейдите в приложение Telegram.
Обсудить в Telegram