Russian MFA 🇷🇺
@MFARussia
🎙 Statement by Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN Vassily Nebenzia at the UNGA Intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Council (Veto Right) (New York, April 14, 2026)
💬 It is well known in professional diplomatic circles that the veto mechanism is the cornerstone of the UN’s functioning.
It was introduced as the result of lessons drawn from the practice of the League of Nations. Without this right, the Organization would have inevitably suffered the same fate.
It is difficult to imagine that the UN, particularly during the Cold War or during these turbulent times, could have survived even a single decade if it were not for this balancing mechanism.
☝️ Forcing a limitation of this mechanism is unrealistic. We need to acknowledge this and move on. <...>
It is no secret that Western members of the Council often view UNSC resolutions as a punitive tool against States in disfavor, whatever noble pretexts are used to tout these resolutions.
❗️ Western delegations frequently introduce intrusive, politicized draft resolutions replete with didactic language, whose sole purpose is to advance geopolitical interests of former colonial powers and impose Western models of development on other States.
We cannot allow the UN Security Council to be used for such ignoble, overtly neocolonial purposes. Therefore, we stand ready to use our veto without hesitation when it comes to defending international law and State sovereignty against arbitrary action and pressure, or with the view to restoring justice. <...>
We are convinced that it is not the veto itself that should be criticized, but rather the unwillingness of certain Council members to listen to and take into account the views of others, so as to reach compromise and balanced solutions.
👉 We regularly encounter situations where Western delegations put to a vote draft resolutions that are in no way acceptable, which they know full well in advance.
Read in full
💬 It is well known in professional diplomatic circles that the veto mechanism is the cornerstone of the UN’s functioning.
It was introduced as the result of lessons drawn from the practice of the League of Nations. Without this right, the Organization would have inevitably suffered the same fate.
It is difficult to imagine that the UN, particularly during the Cold War or during these turbulent times, could have survived even a single decade if it were not for this balancing mechanism.
☝️ Forcing a limitation of this mechanism is unrealistic. We need to acknowledge this and move on. <...>
It is no secret that Western members of the Council often view UNSC resolutions as a punitive tool against States in disfavor, whatever noble pretexts are used to tout these resolutions.
❗️ Western delegations frequently introduce intrusive, politicized draft resolutions replete with didactic language, whose sole purpose is to advance geopolitical interests of former colonial powers and impose Western models of development on other States.
We cannot allow the UN Security Council to be used for such ignoble, overtly neocolonial purposes. Therefore, we stand ready to use our veto without hesitation when it comes to defending international law and State sovereignty against arbitrary action and pressure, or with the view to restoring justice. <...>
We are convinced that it is not the veto itself that should be criticized, but rather the unwillingness of certain Council members to listen to and take into account the views of others, so as to reach compromise and balanced solutions.
👉 We regularly encounter situations where Western delegations put to a vote draft resolutions that are in no way acceptable, which they know full well in advance.
Read in full
10 1.6K
Обсуждение 0
Обсуждение не доступно в веб-версии. Чтобы написать комментарий, перейдите в приложение Telegram.
Обсудить в Telegram