GenRevolution Telegram (GRT) - Official Telegram Channel
@GenRevolutionOfficial
🤣 America Latina after sharing our post against their shitty abortion ideas based on facts? 📉 ... We already though that ...
Like we said, once people have shitty ideas, they are not open to listen to science and facts
@StopDieWelle77
@StopDieWelle78
especially if their brain is bombarded with bullshit religious fake things ...
@ReligionBullshit
This is the big difference between scientists and average people. Scientists are ready to verify and change if facts they discover go against their ideas ... normal people prefer to die following their no sense ideas ...
No matter, WE WILL NEVER change facts or science to make happy people that don't want to listen to science and facts. We will never be a double face organisation, like many other out there.
You can find facts as rude, but the reality is that facts are facts and facts (means real facts based on science and stats, not bullshit personal opinions like most people are sharing...) give a shit how you feel once you listen to them ...
@WomenRightsTelegram414
If people want to be ignorant, well it's their choice. Remember, don't complain or say sorry once things happens.
@DefenceTelegram111
@DefenceTelegram620
@DefenceTelegram621
@DefenceTelegram622
@MissionEcocide5
Like don't complain if you see your house detroyed, because you made an irrational purchase; if you get cancer, because you drink and smoke the whole time; you die, because you visit irrationally a terroristic region; etc.
Everyone can choose how to life, if they want to believe in religion or whatever.
Meanwhile, don't complain about abortion too, if you made 0 research about the consequences of such abortion ... Before doing things, ALWAYS consider all pro and contras! and not just 50%, like most people are doing ...
This even related to our governments, that simply GIVE A SHIT TO FACTS! like they did related to Breivik
@DefenceTelegram627
PS: just to be clear, this is nothing against America Latina, since Arabia is nothing better ... they have many pretty strange ideas related to human / animal / planet rights .. and even nothing against religion, because if religion is not against rights, then it's pretty fine. Example, we have no issues with Hijab
@WomenRightsTelegram573
to
@WomenRightsTelegram580
because Hijab is NOT doing crimes against human / planet / animal rights like other bullshit religion believes based on pedo priests!
@RapeTelegram1694
Related
@RapeTelegram1696
Like we said, once people have shitty ideas, they are not open to listen to science and facts
@StopDieWelle77
@StopDieWelle78
especially if their brain is bombarded with bullshit religious fake things ...
@ReligionBullshit
This is the big difference between scientists and average people. Scientists are ready to verify and change if facts they discover go against their ideas ... normal people prefer to die following their no sense ideas ...
No matter, WE WILL NEVER change facts or science to make happy people that don't want to listen to science and facts. We will never be a double face organisation, like many other out there.
You can find facts as rude, but the reality is that facts are facts and facts (means real facts based on science and stats, not bullshit personal opinions like most people are sharing...) give a shit how you feel once you listen to them ...
@WomenRightsTelegram414
If people want to be ignorant, well it's their choice. Remember, don't complain or say sorry once things happens.
@DefenceTelegram111
@DefenceTelegram620
@DefenceTelegram621
@DefenceTelegram622
@MissionEcocide5
Like don't complain if you see your house detroyed, because you made an irrational purchase; if you get cancer, because you drink and smoke the whole time; you die, because you visit irrationally a terroristic region; etc.
Everyone can choose how to life, if they want to believe in religion or whatever.
Meanwhile, don't complain about abortion too, if you made 0 research about the consequences of such abortion ... Before doing things, ALWAYS consider all pro and contras! and not just 50%, like most people are doing ...
This even related to our governments, that simply GIVE A SHIT TO FACTS! like they did related to Breivik
@DefenceTelegram627
PS: just to be clear, this is nothing against America Latina, since Arabia is nothing better ... they have many pretty strange ideas related to human / animal / planet rights .. and even nothing against religion, because if religion is not against rights, then it's pretty fine. Example, we have no issues with Hijab
@WomenRightsTelegram573
to
@WomenRightsTelegram580
because Hijab is NOT doing crimes against human / planet / animal rights like other bullshit religion believes based on pedo priests!
@RapeTelegram1694
Related
@RapeTelegram1696
Telegram
Think and verify before you act - Piensa y comprueba antes de actuar - Ragiona e verifica prima di agire - Réfléchir et vérifier
Why people don't change mind in front of facts - part 1
Well the fact is THAT BOTH ARE AGGRESSIVE, instead of thinking with the brain.
Means even Israel, just think this example, but there are many more https://t.me/IsraelWarBullshit/579
It's pretty ridiculous that in 2023 PEOPLE ARE NOT ABLE TO REFLECT ON INFORMATIONS THEY GET OR TO TALK ABOUT ... they need to fight directly. At least Ben did it better in this scene https://t.me/IsraelWarBullshit/753 but such things are not done by many people
They have their ideas and they continue to keep such ideas, because reflecting and maybe changing mind is to difficult. Obviously this doesn't happen only with the war, but all things. Just think how many people are still using WhatsApp, even if Telegram is offering more and all things are better. Once people fell "this is perfect" it's difficult to put such people away from their idea "this is perfect", even if in reality "this is not perfect" ...
Conclusion (from a research done in 2023): This article (post) may not change your mind
As argued above, decades of research in multiple elds have demonstrated the limited effectiveness of scientific evidence for shifting social norms, creating uptake of new behaviors, or even generating effective solutions.
Most attitudes and behaviors regarding conservation decision-making are not based on the rational evaluation of evidence, but determined instead by a host of contextual, social, and cultural factors and values. Therefore, providing additional information – even in accessible formats - is not likely to lead to significant changes.
Similarly, it is questionable whether an evidence-based article such as this one will serve to change minds, as accepting the claims above may challenge one's prior beliefs about science communication, and perhaps even one's sense of how the world works. Attitudes and beliefs are highly resistant to change, and scientists are as prone as anyone else to “seeing what we believe” (Gorman and Gorman, 2016).
65
Обсуждение 0
Обсуждение не доступно в веб-версии. Чтобы написать комментарий, перейдите в приложение Telegram.
Обсудить в Telegram