Elon Musk DESTROYED NASA! Part 2

Part 1 @ElonMuskPollution285

Especially as we see an increase in commercial space travel, in which wealthy, private astronauts are paying to travel to space simply for the experience, rather than to provide some scientific or other benefit to society, least of all providing benefit to the earth’s ecosystems.

Currently, space agencies (national or otherwise) do not seem very interested in the broader environmental impacts of their activities or the social and moral implications these entail.

We suggest that future planning efforts should include full lifecycle environmental impacts as part of their evaluation.

Many space agencies (e.g. NASA [8], CNSA/Roscosmos [48], and SpaceX [49]) are currently planning programs for human travel to and habitation on the Moon and even Mars [50]. An increase in future missions to the Moon or Mars means an increase in payloads with increased associated propellant use.

In terms of familiar activities, this is equivalent to each space traveller:
- occupying 20-48 seats on a Boeing 747 that never lands, emissions from long-distance travel are around 98 g CO2-eq per passenger-km [36], which assuming an average long-haul flight of 7100 km and flight time of 9.3 hours [47] gives an hourly emission of 75 kg CO2-eq per passenger.

COMMERCIAL SPACE IS ECOCIDE!
@EcocideTelegram
@StopEcocideTelegram
@ElonMuskPollution8
@ElonMuskPollution13
@ElonMuskPollution29
@GenRevolutionOfficial69
@GenRevolutionOfficial73

but let we talk about Mars, as an excuse to give a shit of the current planet, because at the end, America is well know for that!
@MissionPlaneta43
@MissionPlaneta63
@MissionPlaneta55
@MissionPlaneta54
@ElonMuskPollution78

Elon Musk is just POLLUTION!
@ElonMuskPollution285
and BULLSHIT!
@ElonMuskPollution213