Behind Breivik Sex Bullshit Part 4

Part 1 @BreivikSex62

e) For example you talk about 8 in Switzerland
Even this is bullshit because it depends from many factors!
@BreivikSex48

Plus the real question is "are such stats real, or people just say random numbers just to look more better or whatever ...". So again, stats are shit!
@BreivikSex86

f) do you remember 4 and 8 in USA?
@BreivikSex87

Well, few years later it was 3.5 vs 6 ...
@BreivikSex49

If you check another source, you would probably get other results ...

Germany, you are saying 10 ... from a study done seems less than 10 ... Almost 50% with up to 5 ... (but it was a 20-35 study ...)

And such things don't say ANYTHING about what people are really doing in Germany! or what a single person is doing!

So in summary:

1) Breivik is NOT a scientist!
@BreivikSex62

2) Foreigners are NOT the only criminals / rapers
@BreivikSex63
to
@BreivikSex86

3) Not all girls do sex or get kids when they are teen!

4) Never forget to talk about both! Not just about one sex!

5) Your table is �� because it doesn't show the reality, depends from tons of things, your source is ��, etc. Plus we haven't investigated that in detail

6) No matter what, we should reflect about such topics
@BreivikSex62

7) This is not the only bullshit he said, for example even the topic foreigners in Norway is bullshit
@AndersBehringBreivikTelegram513

8) NO DISCRIMINATION! @NoBreivikMania

9) Crimes done by religion are not ok too!
@ReligionBullshit

Let we remember the topic abortion related to Breivik!
@BreivikSex6
@BreivikSex89

PS: there is much more we can talk, but like said currently we have no time for that!

Well, we currently have no time to do more detailed investigation of what Breivik said (no matter if related to sex or tons of other topics), so let we summarise just some things we noticed until now.

First, Breivik wrote and told during the court that he made things "more wow" than what they are! We already noted such things when we read what he wrote. So already this means, that not all things are facts / reality!

We said multiple times that there are few points that we support (in part), but many we don't support at all! The massacre is for sure the worst thing he did! For that he deserve just death!
@BreivikDeathSentence

What for sure we support is the fact that WE NEED TO IMPROVE HOW WE EDUCATE OUR KIDS!
@BreivikSex61

and we need to properly ban access to inappropriate sites!
@BreivikSex27

and to ban the use of smartphones at school!
@StudentRightsTelegram160

There are 85 cited Wikipedia pages! Wikipedia IS NOT SCIENCE! but this doesn't mean Wikipedia is shit! All depends who is writing such things. We know researchers who invested months to write pages on Wikipedia, so such content is high quality, but otherwise WIKIPEDIA IS NOT SCIENCE! and this even related to Breivik! Always check and verify the source ... Now we haven't verified such things related to Breivik ...

Are you seriously Breivik???!!!! THIS IS SCIENCE FOR YOU????!

You write bullshit promoting as facts BASED ON THE EXPERIENCES OF MY NETWORK OF MALE FRIENDS ��‍♂️

Next time ask your female friends and redo the same table ��‍♂️ ...

This is one of the best example to show that Breivik IS NOT A SCIENTIST at all! and is talking bullshit! but this doesn't mean what he is saying it's all wrong at 100% (now we don't talk about number of sexual partners ... but in general)
@BreivikBullshit89
@BreivikBullshit90

Before we talk about number of sexual partners, let we remember Breivik hate for Muslims ... especially people from specific countries ...

More @BreivikSex

Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 9

Part 1 @DeathSentenceFAQ262

"Furthermore, the ‘innocence movement’ has attracted considerable media attention as persons sentenced to death have been found to be incontrovertibly innocent" Yes Carolyn Hoyle, this is the main problem!!!! Amnesty is mostly promoting just such things!!!
@AmnistiaPropaganda74
@AmnestyExamples
etc.

Carolyn Hoyle (University of Oxford):
@DeathPenaltyMafia

"We have shown that most countries that have abolished the death penalty have put in its place a system where an in- determinate life sentence is available for the worst of the worst murders" ��
SORRY
@AndersBehringBreivikTelegram75
@BreivikDeathSentence4
@BreivikDeathSentence49
to
@BreivikDeathSentence66
@addlist

even Switzerland!
@PrisonBreakFacts60
to
@PrisonBreakFacts84

or better
@PrisonBreakFacts21

without talking about 1-2 years for doing torture to mio of animals ��‍♂️ etc.
@MissionPlaneta59
@AnimalAbuseDeathSentence
@addlist

Carolyn Hoyle: "We, like Coyle and others, such as Robert Badinter, regard this as inhumane"
@DeathPenaltyCruel11
@EmpathyTelegram20
@DeathPenaltyCruel59
to
@DeathPenaltyCruel62
@DeathSentenceFAQ152

Carolyn Hoyle: "In other words, alongside the goal of abolition ..."
@DefenceTelegram1747

Carolyn Hoyle: "In our opinion, sentences of life imprisonment which from the outset preclude any possibility of parole are not only inhumane, they are unnecessary and counter-productive" ��‍♂️ ... but they "ignored that last prisoner executed in Australia ESCAPED!!!
@DeathSentenceFAQ229
@PrisonBreakFacts

without talking about cost, which will be discussed in the next post

Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 7

Part 1 @DeathSentenceFAQ262

Remember that this show exactly the importance of having things before we need that! exactly like for legal suicide and abortion! as we said previously!!!
@DeathSentenceFAQ201
@DeathSentenceFAQ217
@DeathSentenceFAQ218

So again, having a death penalty doesn't mean YOU NEED TO APPLY THAT TO ALL PRISONERS!!!! like you don't use all your wage, otherwise when you are elderly, you have no money at all ... (in case you have a good wage ... for poor people the situation is a bit different ...)

Better to have that, than not to have that!!! Don't forget such point! especially because reenabling death penalty is huge complex!
@EuropeFacts69

So Carolyn Hoyle
@DefenceTelegram1747
near all your bullshit in Amnesty style ... NOPE, we are not using just "celebrities" ...

First, we discovered them all thanks our Breivik investigation and other researchers, NOT NETFLIX OR WHATEVER!
@DefenceTelegram1223
@IsraelWarWomenRights869

and we got interest for Breivik story thanks Hamas (and Norway)

Second, THE MAIN PROBLEM IS THAT PEOPLE FORGET THINGS PRETTY FAST! Like Hamas will be "past" in few months ... This happens with EVERYTHING! People already forgot all pro of getting COVID! (A LOT OF PROS!!!, near killed people and financial problems ...)
@IsraelWarBullshit355
@GenRevolutionOfficial28
@GenRevolutionOfficial217
@GenRevolutionOfficial426
@BreivikFacts5
@BreivikBullshit89
@BreivikBullshit90

NEVER FORGET!!!!
@MahsaAminiTelegram135
@NeverForgetTelegram
@AntoniaBarra
@AliceSchembri
@SuicideRape
@BreivikTrauma

WE FOR SURE WILL NEVER FORGET! so it's not about that Carolyn Hoyle!!

Part 1 @BreivikDeathSentence49

A summary of the last 8 posts @BreivikDeathSentence65

Now in few words:

��‍♂️ animal torture / cruelty ��‍♂️ death penalty to animals done by humans ��‍♂️ train suicide and similar things ��‍♂️ priority of humans over animals ��‍♂️ euthanasia abuse to animals due to ignorance* ��‍♂️ VIP suicide ��‍♂️ indifference for other people rights ��‍♂️@ShittyDeathSentences @ShittyDeathExecutions ��‍♂️ @KeepEyesClosed ��‍♂️ @AmnestyPropaganda @addlist ��‍♂️ @IgnorancePeople ��‍♂️ @PrisonBreakFacts ��‍♂️ @ParoleFacts @BreivikParole ��‍♂️ @HumanRightAbuse ��‍♂️ @DiscriminationTelegram ��‍♂️ @JobDiscrimination ��‍♂️ @EuropeAbuse ��‍♂️ missing empathy = @AspergerSyndromeTelegram @EmpathyTelegram ��‍♂️ bullshits in general!!! without science! and multiple perspective
���� @addlist
���� (2) @addlist
���� @addlist
���� @addlist

✅ Not Today Not Tomorrow
@NotTodayTelegram
@LawsTelegram123

✅ abortion ✅ @StopDieWelle ✅ @EthicalDilemmaHumanRights ✅ new human rights definition based on amount / deep of crimes ✅ @LearnWithNorway = no doing again the exact same errors like in the past!!!! @HanauBreivik ✅ @NoBreivikMania ✅ @BreivikDeathSentence @DeathSentenceFAQ @AnimalAbuseDeathSentence @DeathSentenceNOW ✅ @LawsTelegram @HumanRightsChecklist @MissionPlaneta @WeAreTheFutureTelegram ✅ more rights for animals ✅ life sentences, if death penalties will never be a reality! (WITHOUT PAROLE) ✅ better future based on science / facts and not bullshit ✅ legal suicide instead! = less trauma for families / victims and all people watching such things! ✅ die with dignity and this means

✅ letal dosis for ☑️ legal assisted suicide! and ☑️ death penalty! ��‍♂️ letal dosis crimes by ����!
@DeathPenaltyInhumane56

*
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights154
to
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights157

Behind the death penalty Part 8

Part 1 @BreivikDeathSentence49

Selv om loven er endret slik at man i dag kan dømmes for terror til forvaring med en tidsramme på 30 år og en minstetid på 20 år, kan ikke dommen til Breivik endres. Dette er fordi lover ikke gis tilbakevirkende kraft i Norge https://perma.cc/U5GA-NG7D

Although the law has been changed so that today one can be sentenced for terrorism to detention with a time frame of 30 years and a minimum term of 20 years, Breivik's sentence cannot be changed. This is because laws are not given retroactive effect in Norway.
�� with ���� quality!!! ��‍♂️ cannot be change UNTIL WE START TO CHANGE LAWS ONCE AT ALL!
@LawsTelegram41
and stop doing errors over errors!
@NorwayErrors
@LearnWithNorway
@HanauBreivik

Forsinket oppgradering av datasystemer i politiet og domstolsapparatet gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik ikke kan dømmes etter den nye terrorparagrafen med maksimalstraff på 30 år, skriver Adresseavisen tirsdag.

Delayed upgrading of computer systems in the police and the court apparatus means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik cannot be sentenced under the new terror clause with a maximum sentence of 30 years, writes Adresseavisen on Tuesday ��‍♂️ obviously, because this is ����!!! errors over errors!!!

So now let we summarise all previous posts:

a) we started from the John Bessler bullshit
@JohnBessler142
and we agree it make no sense to apply a death sentence in one case, ignoring that for other ..
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights145
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights147

b) we talked about animal, suicide, abortion and how people forget such cruelty / tortures
@JohnBessler153
@JohnBessler154
@JohnBessler155

c) about Europe mafia!
@EuropeFacts70

d) homicide != homicide
@JohnBessler156
@DeathSentenceFAQ129

e) about other Norway errors ...
@NorwayErrors

Behind the death penalty Part 7

Part 1 @BreivikDeathSentence49

Two years ago (= 2009), the Storting decided that the maximum sentence for terrorism should be 30 years. The Ministry of Justice does not yet know when the new law may enter into force https://perma.cc/TT2X-9X2U
@BreivikDeathSentence4

I proposisjonen Stortinget fikk sto det at dette ville ta tid og at implementeringen av den nye straffeloven var ventet å kunne skje 1. januar 2012. Det er som kjent ikke ennå, sier statssekretær Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) i Justisdepartementet til Nettavisen.

In the proposal the Storting received, it was stated that this would take time and that the implementation of the new penal code was expected to take place on 1 January 2012. As is known, that is not yet, says State Secretary Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) in the Ministry of Justice to Nettavisen.
@BreivikDeathSentence12

Det var Adresseavisen som tirsdag skrev at datarot gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik - med 77 liv på samvittigheten - bare kan dømmes etter den gamle terrorparagrafen med maksimal fengselsstraff på 21 år, ikke den nye Stortinget vedtok i 2009. Den gangen vedtok lovgiverne å øke maksimalstraffen til 30 år.

It was Adresseavisen that wrote on Tuesday that a computer mess means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik - with 77 lives on his conscience - can only be sentenced under the old terror clause with a maximum prison sentence of 21 years, not the new one adopted by the Storting in 2009. At that time, the legislators decided to increase the maximum sentence to 30 years.
@NorwayErrors

Heving av tidsrammen til 30 år ble gjort fordi maksimalstraffen for terror i Norge og flere andre europeiske land er 30 år. På den måten gir man signaler om at Norge ikke er et «safe haven» for terrorister med lavere straffenivå enn andre land.

Raising the time frame to 30 years was done because the maximum sentence for terrorism in Norway and several other European countries is 30 years.

Behind the death penalty Part 6

Part 1 @BreivikDeathSentence49

Blecker does not believe that all murderers deserve the death penalty. But in these cases, he believes that we have a moral obligation to carry out the death penalty https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8

EXACTLY! Not all murders deserve a death penalty!!!
@CrimeExamples117
and remember, is not just related to killing someone or not!
@CrimeExamples118

you could be Breivik, by killing 0 people, you still deserve death for hate crimes!

Let we remember Norway shitty laws related to rape!!! (not only that ...)
@LawsTelegram49

Learn with Norway
@LearnWithNorway
@BreivikDeathSentence45
to
@BreivikDeathSentence47
@LawsTelegram28

Nå blir vel dødsstraff aldri gjeninnført i Norge, (avskaffet i 1948) men maksimumstraffen på 20 år bør heves/endres til ”livslangt fengselsopphold eller institusjon” https://perma.cc/2LYX-9NF6

Now the death penalty will probably never be reintroduced in Norway (abolished in 1948), but the maximum sentence of 20 years should be raised/changed to "life imprisonment or institution".

Will probably never, if NO ONE IS CONTRASTING AMNESTY BULLSHIT. But nope never doesn't mean never, if we promote real facts!
@addlist

No matter, better life, than NOTHING!
@DeathSentenceFAQ177
@PrisonBreakFacts21
@DeathSentenceNOW58
@BreivikDeathSentence45
@AndersBehringBreivikTelegram75

Anders Behring Breivik sier han ikke vil ha respekt for en dom på 21 års fengsel, noe han beskriver som en «latterlig straff» https://perma.cc/Y7VZ-ASJK

Anders Behring Breivik says he will not respect a sentence of 21 years in prison, which he describes as a "ridiculous punishment".

For to år siden vedtok Stortinget at maksimalstraffen for terror skulle være 30 år. Justisdepartementet vet ennå ikke når den nye loven kan tre i kraft.

Behind the death penalty Part 5

Part 1 @BreivikDeathSentence49

Europe is refusing the selling of lethal dosis, a crime that is the reason why shitty death executions get applied, if lethal dosis is not possible anymore!
@DeathPenaltyCruel45
@DeathExecutionMethod
@ShittyDeathExecutions

A crime promoted by Amnesty and John Bessler bullshit propaganda!
@LawsTelegram143
@JohnBessler

by ignoring all other things behind that ...
@BreivikDeathSentence59
to
@BreivikDeathSentence61
@DeathPenaltyCruel
@AmnestyFacts
@addlist

Back to Breivik ...

Da jeg var liten og vokste opp, fikk vi vite at Adolf Hitler var en grusom mann som fortjente å dø https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8

When I was little and growing up, we were taught that Adolf Hitler was a cruel man who deserved to die.

this is the best example!!! because again there is a dilemma:

Killing Hitler or not? like allowing Michael Scofield to do prison break or not?
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights

One thing is sure, Michael Scofield with that caused MUCH MORE DEATHS! and we cannot ignore that!
@DefenceTelegram1742

Same for Hitler ... if we killed Hitler years ago, maybe many people would NEVER DIE!

So the question is, better 1 now, or 1000 later?

Obviously Lincoln Burrows was innocent!
@TedBundyTelegram10
but this doesn't need the fact that the story behind Lincoln Burrows caused more deaths! and Michael said that too!

No matter, we don't stand for discrimination based sentences!
@ShittyDeathSentences
@BlackHumanRights
@DeathSentenceFAQ72
@DeathSentenceFAQ169
@DeathSentenceFAQ146
@DeathSentenceFAQ148

or to make victims ��
@DeathSentenceFAQ122

��‍♂️ to innocent people
@DeathSentenceFAQ176

Blecker mener ikke at alle drapspersoner fortjener dødsstraff

See next post

Behind the death penalty Part 4

Part 1 @BreivikDeathSentence49

Again, not today not tomorrow!
@NotTodayTelegram

Exactly like a refused abortion!
@HumanRightsChecklist115
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights163
to
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights165
etc.

Let we remember that Breivik is a consequence of refused abortion too!
@HumanRightsChecklist201

Is falling the first suicide attempt not a torture?? (especially if a person just want to die, no matter what, even knowing he has a disease, that is just a pain and cannot be fixed with a phone call or whatever!)
@DeathPenaltyCruel12

Now we mean in general, NOT RELATED TO DEPRESSION!!! This should be clear! We DON'T PROMOTE SUICIDE! but fight instead for legal suicide when needed!

and remember ��‍♂️ VIP SUICIDE!
@DeathSentenceNOW60

Why you forget the trauma related to animals???
@AmnestyIgnorance153
@AmnestyIgnorance132

or other type of traumas
@AmnestyIgnorance21

Yes, we apply death penalty to animals too!
@DeathPenaltyCruel55
@AnimalFactsTelegram123
@BauernprotestRealitat41
@DeathPenaltyCruel58

but keeping eyes closed is easier!
@AspergerSyndromeTelegram42
@IgnorancePeople
@IgnoringCrimes
@AmnestyShit95
@AmnestyPropaganda65
@AmnestyPropaganda76

Start to watch all point of views and not just with a limited way! and stop to fight for one thing, ignoring the other!
@IgnorancePeople7
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights

Obviously there is much more behind the death penalty and we cannot just use "suicide" to show that ...
@DeathSentenceFAQ

BUT we don't need to forget the crime done by Europe!
@DeathPenaltyCruel57

A crime that is the reason why shitty death executions get applied, if lethal dosis is not possible anymore!

Behind the death penalty Part 3

Part 1 @BreivikDeathSentence49

He has these thoughts about his own execution:
It means that God is calling me home. I have no life here in prison, so a death sentence will not spoil any plans that have been laid. There is nothing here that I want to hold on to, he says https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
@DeathSentenceNOW60
@SerialKillerDeathSentence15
@SerialKillerDeathSentence19

Han har argumentert for at de som har fått dødsstraff fortjener en rask, og smertefull død, men ikke tortur. Helst ved skyting.

He has argued that those who have received the death penalty deserve a quick and painful death, but not torture. Preferably when shooting.

What exactly is torture? Is an assisted suicide torture??!
NOPE, if applied with brain and not incompetence!!

First NOT TODAY NOT TOMORROW! This should be clear! We wrote now showing a different perspective about such topic, that 99.999% of the people ALWAYS FORGET!
@NotTodayTelegram

Are you thinking about suicide? Get help from your parents, phone centers, etc.
@NotTodayTelegram19

REMEMBER, TONS OF PEOPLE DIE WITH (ASSISTED) SUICIDE
@DeathPenaltyCruel29
but even tons of people die with selfmade suicide = example jumping in front of a train!
@DeathPenaltyCruel59

Is jumping in front of a train or other things NOT A TORTURE??! because of missing laws in our planet, except in few part in ����, ����, ����, ���� (but remember, having assisted suicide doesn't mean everyone can get that! if specific conditions are not respected, we don't mean now depression!!!)
@LawsTelegram122
@LawsTelegram123
@DeathPenaltyCruel11

Is refused assisted suicide NOT a torture??!!
@DeathPenaltyCruel11

Exactly like a refused abortion!
@HumanRightsChecklist115
@HumanRightsChecklist186
@DeathPenaltyCruel11
@EthicalDilemmaHumanRights163

See next post

Behind the death penalty Part 2

Sånn sett er det synd Indrebø ble sparket. Han virker å være en person med fornuftige holdninger, sier Breivik med henvisning til meddommeren som ble fjernet for å ha kommet med en kommentar 23. juli i fjor om at dødsstraff ville vært det eneste rettferdige https://perma.cc/6793-ATPZ

In that sense, it's a shame Indrebø was fired. He seems to be a person with reasonable attitudes, says Breivik, referring to the co-judge who was removed for having made a comment on 23 July last year that the death penalty would be the only fair thing.
@BreivikDeathSentence18
to
@BreivikDeathSentence23

Jeg tenkte at det var en selvmordsaksjon, jeg trodde ikke jeg skulle overleve 22. juli.

I thought it was a suicide attempt, I didn't think I would survive the 22nd of July.

Breivik sa han regnet med at det var «fem prosent sannsynlighet» for at han skulle overleve angrepet i Regjeringskvartalet.

Breivik said he reckoned there was a "five percent probability" that he would survive the attack in the Government Quarter.

Det er tross alt Norges best bevoktede bygninger. Men så overlevde jeg ikke bare det, jeg overlevde Utøya også.

After all, they are Norway's best-guarded buildings. But then I not only survived that, I also survived Utøya.
�� .... SURE!!
Scroll from
@BreivikErrors11

Like etter at han ble pågrepet på Utøya 22. juli, kom han med en rekke krav til politiet. Blant dem var at det skulle innføres dødsstraff og såkalt waterboarding, vanntortur, i Norge.

Shortly after he was arrested on Utøya on 22 July, he made a number of demands to the police. Among them was that the death penalty and so-called waterboarding, water torture, should be introduced in Norway.

Disse tankene har han om sin egen henrettelse:
Det betyr at Gud kaller meg hjem. Jeg har ikke noe liv her i fengsel, så en dødsstraff vil ikke forkludre noen planer som er lagt. Det er ikke noe her som jeg ønsker å holde fast i, sier han.

Sorry, you are talking about nature ... and there is even not a nature in the index of your book ��‍♂️ ...
@DeathPenaltyCruel55
@AnimalCrueltyFacts
@BauernprotestRealitat

and with this example, you show even the fact, that death penalty should not be used everytime and everywhere.

You can have a death penalty WITHOUT using it, just when needed!
@AmnestyBullshit321

THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET

Not that you come here "ops, it was better to have that" ... Do you need assisted suicide now, if you don't wish to die?? NOPE Do you need abortion now, if you are not pregnant?? NOPE Do you need ....? NOPE!

This doesn't mean that you don't need such things in future too! Remember

a) removing death penalty is synonym of HAVING AN HARD LIFE TO REIMPLEMENT THAT!
@EuropeFacts55
@EuropeFacts56
@EuropeFacts36
@EuropeFacts69

b) or no way to reimplement that
@JohnBessler132

c) don't forget Norway!
@BreivikDeathSentence18
to
@BreivikDeathSentence23

Synes du det hadde vært riktig om Norge innførte dødsstraff i forbindelse med denne saken, lurte aktor Inga Bejer Engh.

Det hadde vært det riktige på mange måter. Skal man vurdere en sak som dette, er det bare to utganger. Jeg ser på 21 års fengsel som en patetisk straff, svarte Breivik.

Do you think it would have been right if Norway introduced the death penalty in connection with this case, wondered prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh.

It would have been the right thing in many ways. If one considers a case like this, there are only two ways out. I see 21 years in prison as a pathetic punishment, Breivik replied.
@BreivikBullshit81

only 50 prisoners?

Well, we already said that they get applied at too lower rate ...
@DefenceTelegram1706
@DeathSentenceFAQ24
@CrimeExamples110