It's time to reimplement the death sentence worldwide - Utøya massacre example - part 5

Part 1: @TerrorismTelegram341

Men jeg synes nesten det skumleste er hvor utydelige grensene er når det kommer til hvem som får dødsstraff og hvem som ikke gjør det https://perma.cc/GLF4-VXVE
= But I think the scariest thing is how unclear the boundaries are when it comes to who gets the death penalty and who doesn't.

Yes, this is the main problem! but even not a reason to remove that at all. There are still cases where we know exactly such things ... Again, death sentences should be done with brain and facts, not shit and personal interests
@WomenRightsTelegram504
@AmnestyBullshit509
@AmnestyBullshit201

Remember that a lot of misinformation is spread from Amnesty using bullshit stats
@WomenRightsTelegram340
& using studies financed by people that are fighting the death sentence!
@AmnestyBullshit259
@AmnestyBullshit460

Keep in mind what we wrote previously: we agree to NOT KILL A TERRORIST!
@TerrorismTelegram218
@TerrorismTelegram288

& that a death sentence for example could maybe not reduce criminality, BUT WE HAVE NO RECIDIVISM PROBLEM ANYMORE!

Plus remember that homicide is not homicide, like we wrote here (see bottom)
@RapeTelegram709
so it's time to make a clear distinction ..

Grusomme handlinger fortjener straff, men i det norske straffesystemet skal innsatte også rehabiliteres og hjelpes tilbake til samfunnet så godt det lar seg gjøre https://perma.cc/BR93-MJJ2

= Cruel acts deserve punishment, but in the Norwegian penal system inmates must also be rehabilitated and helped back into society as best as possible.
—> remember that Norway spend tons of money, what other countries are not able to do that!
@PrisonFacts124
@PrisonFacts126

and not always rehabilitation can help ... so again, depends from case to case

Related:
@WomenRightsTelegram337